data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6452c/6452c8cc66676d778c3bfea9bd676b2b5e3f41a9" alt="The latest trade measures, set to take effect on March 4, 2025, include a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico and Canada and an increase from 10% to 20% on Chinese-origin products. Image for illustration purposes"
Texas Border Business
Texas Border Business
February 28, 2025—The U.S. has ignited a new wave of trade conflict by announcing steep tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China. This move is already prompting threats of retaliation from key trading partners. President Donald Trump’s administration is citing national security concerns, including drug trafficking and migration issues, to justify these actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The latest trade measures, set to take effect on March 4, 2025, include a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico and Canada and an increase from 10% to 20% on Chinese-origin products. While these policies aim to curb foreign reliance and protect domestic industries, they have alarmed global markets and raised fears of a new round of retaliatory trade measures that could disrupt supply chains and increase consumer prices.
The U.S. had initially delayed the tariffs for 30 days in early February after Canada and Mexico agreed to enhance border security and counter-drug trafficking measures. However, with insufficient negotiations, the tariffs are now scheduled for full implementation.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has vowed an “immediate and extremely strong response”, including retaliatory tariffs on nearly 400 U.S. agricultural products. These retaliatory tariffs—initially announced and later revoked when the U.S. paused its decision—are likely to be reinstated and target key American exports, such as:
- Meat products (pork, poultry, dairy).
- Grain and row crops (wheat, barley, rice).
- Fresh produce (oranges, tomatoes, green beans).
- Processed foods (chocolates, pasta, soup).
If Canada proceeds with these tariffs, American farmers and food manufacturers could face substantial losses, as Canada remains one of the largest buyers of U.S. agricultural products.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has not yet confirmed countermeasures but is willing to negotiate with the U.S. Previous reports indicate that Mexico may retaliate by imposing tariffs on U.S. imports of pork, cheese, fresh produce, steel, and aluminum.
Mexico is one of the largest importers of U.S. pork and cheese, so retaliatory tariffs would directly affect American farmers and food producers, intensifying economic strain in the sector.
China Faces Doubling of Tariffs Amid Fentanyl Crackdowns
The trade war extends beyond North America. Tariffs on Chinese-origin products—including those from Hong Kong—will double from 10% to 20%.
President Trump’s administration is linking this measure to China’s role in the production and exportation of fentanyl and precursor chemicals, a major factor in the U.S. opioid crisis. While China has denied these accusations, the U.S. argues that aggressive trade restrictions will put economic pressure on Beijing to take stronger action.
However, China has historically responded to U.S. tariffs with its retaliatory trade policies, often targeting U.S. agricultural and technology sectors. It remains to be seen whether China will escalate the situation by:
- Increasing tariffs on American agricultural products (soybeans, corn, beef).
- Restricting exports of critical rare-earth minerals are essential to U.S. technology and defense industries.
- Imposing new regulatory hurdles for American companies operating in China.
In addition to these tariffs, the Trump administration has signaled plans to impose new tariffs on automobiles, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, starting at 25% and potentially increasing over time. This move is part of a strategy to incentivize foreign manufacturers to relocate production to the U.S..
The automotive and semiconductor industries, in particular, are closely monitoring these potential tariffs, as they could severely disrupt global supply chains and raise costs for U.S. consumers.
U.S. Launches Section 232 Investigation on Copper Imports
Adding to trade uncertainties, President Trump has ordered a Section 232 investigation into the national security implications of copper imports. This investigation will assess imports of:
- Raw mined copper
- Copper concentrates
- Refined copper
- Copper alloys and scrap copper
- Downstream derivative products
This move mirrors previous Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum, which saw import duties of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum. If the investigation finds copper imports pose a risk, similar tariffs could be imposed, affecting industries ranging from construction to high-tech manufacturing.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has announced two new public comment initiatives:
- Chinese Ship Fees – The USTR is considering a fee of up to $1.5 million per Chinese-built ship that docks at U.S. ports to counter China’s dominance in global shipbuilding.
- Public hearing request deadline: March 10, 2025
- Comment submission deadline: March 24, 2025
- Unfair Trade Practices Review – The USTR invites companies to submit evidence of non-reciprocal foreign trade policies that harm U.S. businesses.
- Comment submission deadline: March 11, 2025
These initiatives allow U.S. businesses and exporters to voice concerns about trade barriers and unfair competitionfrom other countries.
The global economy faces increased volatility as the U.S. escalates its trade measures. Potential retaliatory tariffs from Canada, Mexico, and China could lead to:
- Higher consumer prices on imported goods.
- Supply chain disruptions are affecting industries from agriculture to electronics.
- Potential job losses in sectors reliant on international trade.
Economists warn that while tariffs may protect specific domestic industries, they can also lead to economic stagnation, increase costs for businesses and consumers, and weaken diplomatic ties between key allies.
With March 4, 2025, approaching, businesses and governments worldwide brace for impact. The U.S. administration insists that these tariffs are necessary to protect national security and domestic industries, while critics argue they threaten economic stability and damage international relations.
As negotiations continue behind the scenes, the next few weeks will determine whether diplomatic resolutions can be reached—or if the world is on the brink of a full-scale trade war.
Stay tuned for further updates as this fast-moving situation unfolds.
Data provided by OFW Law and other sources.